All five incorporate at least one of the themes found in Frankenstein and are broad enough so that it will be easy to find textual support, yet narrow enough to provide a focused clear thesis statement.
Satsue Mito Primatology in sociobiology[ edit ] Where sociobiology attempts to understand the actions of all animal species within the context of advantageous and disadvantageous behaviors, primatology takes an exclusive look at the order Primates, which includes Homo sapiens. The interface between primatology and sociobiology examines in detail the evolution of primate behavioral processes, and what studying Behavior human thesis closest living primate relatives can tell about our own minds.
The meeting point of these two disciplines has become a nexus of discussion on key issues concerning the evolution of sociality, the development and purpose of language and deceit, and the development and propagation of culture.
Additionally, this interface is of particular interest to the science watchers in science and technology studies, who examine the Behavior human thesis conditions which incite, mould, and eventually react to scientific discoveries and knowledge.
The STS approach to primatology and sociobiology stretches beyond studying the apes, into the realm of observing the people studying the apes. Taxonomic basis[ edit ] Before Darwinand before molecular biologythe father of modern taxonomy, Carl Linnaeusorganized natural objects into kinds, that we now know reflect their evolutionary relatedness.
He sorted these kinds by morphologythe shape of the object. Animals such as monkeys, chimpanzees and orangutans resemble humans closely, so Linnaeus placed Homo sapiens together with other similar-looking organisms into the taxonomic order Primates.
From grooming to speaking[ edit ] See also: Origin of language Although social grooming is observed in many animal species, the grooming activities undertaken by primates are not strictly for the elimination of parasites.
In primates, grooming is a social activity that strengthens relationships. The amount of grooming taking place between members of a troop is a potent indicator of alliance formation or troop solidarity.
Robin Dunbar suggests a link between primate grooming and the development of human language. This number is referred to as the monkeysphere. If a population exceeds the size outlined by its cognitive limitations, the group undergoes a schism.
Set into an evolutionary context, the Dunbar number shows a drive for the development of a method of bonding that is less labor-intensive than grooming: As the monkeysphere grows, the amount of time that would need to be spent grooming troopmates soon becomes unmanageable.
Furthermore, it is only possible to bond with one troopmate at a time while grooming. The evolution of vocal communication solves both the time constraint and the one-on-one problem, but at a price.
Language allows for bonding with multiple people at the same time at a distance, but the bonding produced by language is less intense. This view of language evolution covers the general biological trends needed for language development, but it takes another hypothesis to uncover the evolution of the cognitive processes necessary for language.
Although these modules do not need to be physically distinct, they must be functionally distinct. Orangutans are currently being taught language at the Smithsonian National Zoo using a computer system developed by primatologist Dr.
Francine Neago in conjunction with IBM. DA can be selected for just as a gene can, eventually improving cognition. The contrary theory, of generalist mind, suggests that the brain is just a big computer that runs one program, the mind.
If the mind is a general computer, for instance, the ability to use reasoning should be identical regardless of the context. This is not what is observed. However, when exposed to a test with an identical rule set but socially relevant content, respondents score markedly higher.
The difference is especially pronounced when the content is about reward and payment.
This test strongly suggests that human logic is based on a module originally developed in a social environment to root out cheaters, and that either the module is at a huge disadvantage where abstract thinking is involved, or that other less effective modules are used when faced with abstract logic.
Further evidence supporting the modular mind has steadily emerged with some startling revelations concerning primates. A very recent study indicated that human babies and grown monkeys approach and process numbers in a similar fashion, suggesting an evolved set of DA for mathematics Jordan.
The conceptualization of both human infants and primate adults is cross-sensory, meaning that they can add 15 red dots to 20 beeps and approximate the answer to be 35 grey squares.
As more evidence of basic cognitive modules are uncovered, they will undoubtedly form a more solid foundation upon which the more complex behaviors can be understood. In contradiction to this, neuroscientist Jaak Panksepp has argued that the mind is not a computer nor is it massively modular.
He states that no evidence of massive modularity or the brain as a digital computer has been gained through actual neuroscience, as opposed to psychological studies. He criticises psychologists who use the massive modularity thesis for not integrating neuroscience into their understanding.
In order to understand the staggeringly complex nature of primate interactions, we look to theory of mind. Theory of mind asks whether or not an individual recognizes and can keep track of information asymmetry amongst individuals in the group, and whether or not they can attribute folk psychological states to their peers.
If some primates can tell what others know and want and act accordingly, they can gain advantage and status. His studies have shown that chimpanzees can recognize whether a researcher desires a dropped object, and act accordingly by picking it up.
Even more compelling is the observation that chimps will only act if the object is dropped in an accidental-looking manner: In a related experiment, groups of chimps were given rope-pulling problems they could not solve individually.
However primates do not always fare so well in situations requiring theory of mind.The Effect of Social Media on Human Behavior Essay Sample. How Has Social Media Affected Human Behavior and Thinking?
In this modern age in which you can be completely disconnected from the world by not having access to the endless information provided by the Internet, it is imperative to have Internet access to be able to be as efficient as possible and be able to create your own network.
Recently published articles from Research in Organizational Behavior. The unpredictability of human behavior tries to show that people are unique and operate on different ideas and backgrounds. In addition, the brain of a human being is independent to that of another person, therefore, this creates a diversity of how people think, act and make decisions.
The study of human behavior requires a deep and thorough research on people in different places and environments. Jaffe, Evan, "A Case Study: Use of Applied Behavior Analysis with an Austistic Adolescent" ().PCOM Psychology Dissertations.
Paper Most importantly, a good thesis statement makes a statement. After all, it’s called a thesis statement for a reason! “This is an interesting statement!” you want your reader to think. Human resource management is administrative activities associated with human resources planning, recruitment, selection, orientation, training, appraisal, motivation and also a functions within an organization that focuses on people (Wikipedia, ).