A comparison of niccolo machiavellis leadership with the catholic church

Citizens as Enemy Combatants Jackson and Indian Removal Machiavelli and The Prince At the peak of the Italian Renaissance, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a brutally frank handbook for leaders, advising them how to take and hold political power. Aroundthe Italian Renaissance flourished. New styles of art, architecture, and literature emerged. At the same time, political conspiracies, warring mercenary armies, and foreign invasions stalked the land.

A comparison of niccolo machiavellis leadership with the catholic church

How the Strength of All Principalities Should Be Measured Although a prince should always aim to keep an army of size and strength equaling that of any aggressor, it is just as important to maintain defenses and fortifications. These defensive preparations not only provide security but also deter enemies from attacking.

Some might argue that if an enemy lays siege to a fortified city, the people inside, upon witnessing their countryside pillaged and possessions destroyed, will turn against their prince.

But a prince who has made adequate defensive preparations can actually inspire his subjects during such times. This way, when the siege is over, the grateful and obliged people will love the prince all the more. Summary — Chapter XI: Concerning Ecclesiastical Principalities Ecclesiastical principalities, regions under the control of the Catholic Church, are different from other kinds of principalities.

Taking control of these principalities is difficult, requiring either unusual good fortune or prowess. Machiavelli sarcastically remarks that principles of religion, rather than governments, rule ecclesiastical principalities, so the prince does not even need to govern.

Ecclesiastical principalities do not need to be defended, and their subjects require no administration. Nonetheless, these states are always secure and happy. It is useful, however, to look at how the Church has obtained its great temporal power.

Italy was once divided among the pope and the city-states of Venice, Naples, Milan, and Florence. Each of these powers was wary of the others and prevented the intervention of any foreign power. Papal power was fairly weak during this time, due to disagreement among the Roman barons and the short duration of papacies.

Free a comparison of niccolo machiavellis leadership with the catholic church Essay help online political philosophy An analysis of the topic of the july 16th and the baltimore and ohio railroad papers. a literary analysis of the short happy life of francis macomber by ernest hemingway. an analysis of the topic and story of an hour. It’s been years—half a millennium—since Niccolò Machiavelli wrote The Prince, and for nearly as long, the man and the book have stimulated controversy and debate. The Catholic Church banned Machiavelli’s works in (putting him in the company of Plato, Aristotle, and Homer). Machiavelli's promotion of ambition among leaders while denying any higher standard meant that he encouraged risk-taking, and innovation, most famously the founding of new modes and orders. the Catholic Church banned The Prince, The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli in different formats and languages; Site containing The Prince.

Thus, the current Church, under the leadership of Pope Leo X, has been made strong through the force of arms. It is now hoped that Pope Leo will use his goodness and virtue to maintain its power. Analysis — Chapters X—XI Although Chapter X focuses partly on maintaining the well-being of the people in a city during a period of difficulty, Machiavelli views this only as a necessary step in making the city itself strong and immune from attack.

One surprising characteristic of The Prince is how completely it defines the city as an entity existing to serve its ruler rather than its populace. The discussion of fortification emphasizes this conception of the city: The purpose of convincing the people that their hardships are temporary, for example, is not to lighten the burden of the people whose city is besieged, but rather a way to ensure the defense of the city.

A comparison of niccolo machiavellis leadership with the catholic church

The ultimate goal is not happiness but patriotism: Although the fortification of cities has a military value, Machiavelli focuses on fortification as a tool by which a prince can solidify popular support in times of war or siege.

His acknowledgment that ecclesiastical principalities are not subject to the historical patterns he observes, and his description of their immunity from bad rulers and war, initially seem to point to a respect for religion and acknowledgment of a higher moral plane on which a state can exist.

In reality, Machiavelli understands ecclesiastical principalities to be examples of the effective consolidation of power, much in the same way as the examples of successful princes that he cites. He focuses on the factors that ultimately led to the Catholic Church gaining control over Italian principalities, and reveals that these factors were not essentially different than those used by other princes to gain power.

Like other princes, the Church used armed force, the accumulation of wealth, and astute political strategy in order to gain control. Even though Machiavelli opens the chapter professing that ecclesiastical principalities exist in their own category, ultimately he views them just as he does any other state.Machiavelli's promotion of ambition among leaders while denying any higher standard meant that he encouraged risk-taking, and innovation, most famously the founding of new modes and orders.

A comparison of niccolo machiavellis leadership with the catholic church

the Catholic Church banned The Prince, The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli in different formats and languages; Site containing The Prince. In , The Prince, as well as all of Machiavelli's books were banned and put on the "Index of Prohibited Books" list.

The Catholic Church believed that Machiavelli promoted anti-Christian beliefs. The Renaissance and the Protestant Reformation were similar in that both were. Which idea about leadership would Niccolo Machiavelli most likely support. kings and Princes in Northern Europe resented the power of the Catholic Church.

Karl Marx and Niccolo Machiavelli are interested in two completely different forms of government. Yet both philosophers share many of the same key terms. They both understand the power and importance of deceit, and how it is gained. Using the example of the leadership of the Catholic Church, Machiavelli insists that not even the Church can escape the use of violence and treachery.

In Chapter XVI, Machiavelli debunks the Church’s hypocrisy by saying that the greatness and wealth of the Church had been achieved with war-mongering, betrayal, and force. About The Prince.

Il Principe, or The Prince, While Machiavelli understood that leaders naturally aimed to garner glory and honour for themselves, he did not hector them with the popular Christian ideals of ethical or moral goals.

Given the animosity towards Machiavelli’s works by the church, these words have to be taken with a grain.

Machiavelli the Devil